One
evening in May, in a small classroom at Mills College, I sat among Bay Area educators
sharing research from our year as Teachers Scholars. I had presented my work on
how Kindergartners collaborate in strategic partnerships to write stories.
Among the handful of listeners was a Berkeley law professor, who approached me
afterwards: “This was eye-opening,” he shared, “Listening to you present has gotten me thinking about how I and my
colleagues can do a better job with similar pedagogic inquiries with our own law
students.” I was astonished. In eight years of teaching, the most common comment
I hear from people when they learn that I teach Kindergarten is “How sweet.
They are so cute.” And here was this law professor making connections between our
students, hoping that his work teaching twenty six year olds to collaborate
might be informed by the practices of my five year olds.
WRITING
STORY PLAYS IN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS
In my classroom, students work together to write Story Plays. In strategic
partnerships, they plan a story, draw it, tell it, and then make revisions as
it is acted out by their peers. Children are natural storytellers, but most
five year olds have very limited skills in writing mechanics.
When my students wrote stories
alone, I noticed that some children—like my focal student, Ana—just drew
pictures of sun and rainbows, seemingly stuck and unable to imagine an original
story, despite advanced literacy skills. Others, particularly English Language
Learners like Dani, had elaborate ideas, but little structure to organize them.
I wondered what story might emerge if these two worked together. I hoped their
strengths would complement each other’s challenge areas.
And so I began my inquiry this
year, setting out to collect data that might help me understand the intricacies
of the collaborative writing process. While Ana and Dani were creating fierce
crocodiles and powerful princesses together, I spent the year transcribing,
coding and analyzing videos of their conversations during planning, drawing,
and dictation.
THE
COLLABORATIVE PROCESS: DATA HIGHLIGHTS
I wanted my students to produce structured narratives with a strong beginning, middle and end. I wanted them to engage in a collaborative process in which they shared ideas and took turns, listened
to and built off each other’s ideas.
When they first began working together, Ana
would silently draw and Dani would dominate, talking
over Ana, not listening to her ideas and, at times, not even allowing her to
draw. When they ran into
conflict or ran out of ideas, they would draw rainbows. I had hoped that Dani would inspire richer story
content from Ana, but instead, she was keeping her from talking at all. I
regretted pairing them together. I considered giving them new partners. But, instead,
I made some changes in my teaching.
We began talking
explicitly about different ways partners work together. Some pairs,
we discovered, liked to both draw at the same time, while others liked to take
turns, one drawing while the other talked. Some pairs took turns dictating the
story, one telling the beginning and the other the end, while other pairs
dictated jointly, often finishing each other’s
sentences. Before they set out to create their next story together, I had partners
think about these examples and talk about how they planned to work together.
In addition to this explicit and
detailed focus on how partners work together,
my students’ collaborative process was strengthened by having multiple
opportunities with the same partner. Dani and Ana’s partnership lasted over
several months of Story Plays. With each session, they grew more familiar with
each other’s style, and rather than moving on to a new partner the next time,
they had to develop a relationship, working through the challenges they faced. I,
too, worked with them through these challenges, supporting them in their
process, which I had grown to understood intimately from watching hours of
video of them together.
By late November, the dynamic between Dani
and Ana had shifted considerably. They were listening to each other talk,
watching each other draw, and incorporating and building off of
each other’s ideas. Dani would talk about a plan for a story and Ana would draw
and add on to that plan. Dani would watch her ideas come to life in Ana’s
drawing and then elaborate with more details. Ana, whose original story idea
had been short and simple, would end with a long and detailed dictation that
incorporated her own ideas as well as Dani’s, developed through the drawing and
talking process.
As they learned to work more collaboratively, their story
content grew stronger. Instead of just rainbows and disjointed series of
events, there were elements of character, setting, problem and solution. They
had a clearer plan from the start and
stuck with it through drawing and final dictation, as the queen was
eaten by crocodiles and brought back to life by the princess and her magic
wand. While there is still room for growth in their work, I am convinced that the narratives that emerge from this collaborative process
are richer and more complex than those that come from any one child alone. Through
Story Plays—when students have opportunities to work with a partner, talk and
draw together, then see their story play acted out—they are exploring and experimenting with what makes a
good story and developing important oral language skills that are the
foundation for reading and writing.
TEACHING COLLABORATION
So how do we teach students to work
together—t o listen to each other, build off of and add on to one another’s
ideas? How do we teach collaboration? Unlike Ana and Dani’s princess, I have no
magic wand to wave over my students so they will join together and create rich
and detailed Story Plays. But through collecting and analyzing authentic data
from the students in my classroom, my teaching practice has deepened. From
slowing down and zooming in on their process, I have learned to notice patterns
in the partnerships and to adjust my teaching to facilitate more collaborative
relationships. I have learned that its ok for partners to struggle, to stick
with a difficult pairing and to do the hard work of learning how to work
together.
It is complicated and difficult supporting
children in the complexity of collaboration. But if they do not learn, now, at
five, how to work together with others, they may find themselves, at
twenty-six, struggling in a partnership in a law school classroom.





No comments:
Post a Comment